The Rise of Robotic Art
Does the intertwining of art and technology, especially with the rise of AI and robotics, risk human creativity and artistic authorship? Philosopher Walter Benjamin theorizes that this crossover between robotics and art challenges the traditional notions of what it means to be authentic. Artist Douglas Davis anticipates a redefinition of authorship.
Fig. 1. AARON, “Collage by the Painting Fool”, MIT Technology Review, https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/02/15/162067/robot-art-raises-questions-about-human-creativity/
Walter Benjamin’s essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction argues that the “aura” (its unique presence in space and time) of a work breaks down with mechanical reproduction (Benjamin 2). He cites how the rise of photography has mass-produced images that are taking away from the traditional value of art.
Douglas Davis, on the other hand, extends this conversation by arguing that the aura does not vanish; instead, it migrates. He writes about how each digital copy of an artwork becomes a site for collaboration (Davis 1). Instead of being one, singular, untouchable original piece, digital and robotic art allows for fluidity and interactivity. Each iteration is unique.
Ai-Da is an AI-powered robot developed by Aiden Meller, who is able to draw, paint, and even speak about art (Ai-Da). Very similarly, Doug is a robotic drawing partner developed by Sougwen Chung. Both artists view robotic creativity as expressive and cultural, rather than an artificial tool (Irpino).
Fig. 2. Celeste Sloman, “Artist Sougwen Chung works in her Brooklyn studio”, The Washington Post, https://artrkl.com/blogs/news/robotics-in-art
Fig. 3. Andy Hall/The Observer, “Ai-Da Robot with creator Aiden Meller”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/apr/04/mind-blowing-ai-da-becomes-first-robot-to-paint-like-an-artist
I think the increasing blend of art and robots forces us to reconsider the boundaries of creativity. Machines may not be able to feel emotions or imagine like humans, but they also extend human capabilities, allowing for the sharing of art to wider spaces (Gayford).
Works Cited
Ai-Da. “Ai-Da.” Ai-Da, 2019, www.ai-darobot.com/.
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Penguin Books, 1936.
Davis, Douglas. “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction (an Evolving Thesis: 1991-1995).” Leonardo, vol. 28, no. 5, 1995, pp. 381–86, https://doi.org/10.2307/1576221.
Irpino, Louise. “Robotics in Art.” ArtRKL, 20 Mar. 2024, artrkl.com/blogs/news/robotics-in-art.
Martin, Gayford. “Robot Art Raises Questions about Human Creativity.” MIT Technology Review, 15 Feb. 2016, www.technologyreview.com/2016/02/15/162067/robot-art-raises-questions-about-human-creativity/.
Hi Kylie, your blog piece raises a really interesting point about how AI and robotics are transforming what we consider authentic and creative in art. Davis’s idea of the "aura" migrating is genuinely interesting it helps explain the movement where that digital art isn’t losing value, but instead is evolving into something more collaborative. Do you think this change strengthens or weakens the meaning behind a work of art? Personally, I think it strengthens the meaning. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteI found your blog interesting to read because it was a good comparison of the different views of robotics in art. I liked how you started off with Walter Benjamin's essay and mentioned his view on aura and how he believes photography devalues art in a way. I too wrote about Sougwen Chung and found it cool to see her artwork.
ReplyDeleteHi Kylie! Your blog raises a compelling point about whether technology expands or threatens human creativity. I also focused on robotics and AI and how it may enhance our creativity rather than replace us. Indeed, Davis's idea that aura migrates is a modernized take on the conversation versus Benjamin's stark assertion of aura being diminished with technology. I also believe that it is imperative to ask how we define aura and value in this new, technologically advanced space?
ReplyDelete